© APA / AFP / LOIC VENANCE / LOIC VENANCE
On the iPhone-Events one has pioneered in the past few years Innovations sorely missed. Instead, Apple has caught up with the manufacturers of Android phones in most respects, but has the respective functions for perfection driven.
So Apple has introduced new functions and components mostly of the Android competition left. So were Samsung, Xiaomi, Huawei, Vivo, OnePlus and Oppo Always one step ahead of the iPhone manufacturer with new features.
In some functions Apple is still lagging behind the Android competition, in some things it has iPhone manufacturer but one step ahead.
Xiaomi advertises its 11T Pro with a charging capacity of 120 Watt. A full charge of the battery should be done in just 17 minutes. Apart from the top-of-the-range Xiaomi device, they have themselves at Mid-range Android devices Established charging capacities of 30 watts and higher. The current top Apple device, the iPhone 13 Pro Max, on the other hand, can with a maximum of 27 Watt to be charged.
Even if the battery of the iPhones is practically in Snail’s pace can be charged, it lasts a particularly long time – at least with the current 13-series iPhones. At least that’s how the Battery life of the iPhone 13 Pro Max eclipses the Android competition.
120 Hz Display als Standard
With the introduction of the OLED Displays left for an unusually long time. Also the first 120 Hz Screen came on an iPhone a year and a half after Samsung installed such a screen, which has now become the standard on cheaper Android devices.
At Apple, only the much more expensive Pro models are equipped with a 120 Hz display. The standard models of the 13 lineup still have a refresh rate of only 60 Hz.
It should be noted, however, that a 120 Hz display of a 300 euro android is difficult to match with the 120 Hz OLED of the iPhone 13 Pro Max lets compare. In terms of contrast, brightness, color matching and response speed, Apple is the Mid-range Android devices way ahead.
Virtually every Android device equipped with an OLED screen has one Always-On-Funktion. To see the notifications, the time or missed calls on the mobile phone screen without having to activate the screen is extremely practical.
Anyone who is used to such a feature will sorely miss it on the iPhones. Since an always-on display does not only depend on the hardware, the hope remains that Apple will provide such a feature Software-Update delivers later.
Zoom and megapixels
While some of the cameras on top Android devices have 100 Megapixel and dissolve more, Apple continues to rely on solid 12-MP-Kameras. It looks similar with the optical zoom: The Pro models of the iPhone 13 have one 3x optical zoom, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has about one 10x optical zoom.
Some Android flagships are advertised with 100x-Hybrid-Zoom. At Apple is here at 15x end. However, Apple should follow the motto “What is the point of a 100x hybrid zoom if the result is not really satisfactory?” stay true
In terms of specs alone, this is where Apple loses the battle. But the number of pixels alone says nothing about the actual number Photo quality the end. And here the iPhone manufacturer doesn’t have to hide from the competition. Quite the opposite: With the iPhone 13 Pro, Apple has presented quite a bit and, above all, is sticking to the Video quality unmatched.
Notch instead of camera hole
Apples Face ID requires additional sensors in addition to a conventional selfie camera. These take up additional space and so the current iPhones still come with one wide bar notch.
With the Android competition there is no Face ID and, as a result, no more notch. In practically all non-Apple devices, the front camera is in one small hole hidden in the display. Several manufacturers are already experimenting with it invisible selfie camerasthat are below the display panel.
Again there is a compromise: In terms of design, the notch is pretty hideous, but allows a selfie camera that can take particularly nice pictures with the help of the depth sensors.
Face ID statt Fingerprint
Android phones include a Fingerprint-Sensor, which is built into the display, has been standard for years. How well and reliably these work depends mainly on the manufacturer and the price range.
At Apple, the Touch ID with the iPhone X and the related premiere of Face ID banned from cell phones. It is debatable whether the advantages of Face ID outweigh fingerprint sensors.
What is certain, however, is that face recognition is far less flexible is. If you want to unlock an iPhone lying at the table using Face ID or if you wear mouth and nose protection, then face recognition quickly reaches its limits.
Lightning connector instead of USB-C
There are probably numerous iPhone users who already have one USB-C connector on their cell phones. At the latest when the iPhone ran out of battery and several colleagues wanted to help out with a USB-C cable, but nobody wanted to help out Lightning cable would have.
It is questionable that the Lightning connector has significant technical advantages over USB-C. In the sense of the cross-manufacturer compatibility In any case, it would be desirable if Apple also switched to the USB-C standard.
Where is Apple ahead of the Android competition?
On the discussion whether Android or iOS is the better operating system for smartphones, we don’t want to get involved at this point. Also the question of which Ecosystem offers more benefits, everyone can answer for themselves.
Regardless of this, it can be said that, for example, the Video quality the iPhone cameras are unrivaled. No Android phone can offer such high quality videos. In the Photo quality the current iPhone is at least on a par with the top Android devices.
If you make a comparison based on the benchmarks of the Processors, Apple is miles ahead of Android manufacturers. The one year old iPhone 12 with its A14 Bionic has all Android devices with the still current one Snapdragon 888 left behind. And that’s despite the fact that the iPhone 12 was introduced some time before the Qualcomm chip.
With the A15 Bionic Apple has further expanded this lead. It remains to be seen how the upcoming flagship processor from Qualcomm beats against the Apple chip.
Where Android phones currently cannot hold a candle to iPhones is that long-term supply of system and security updates. Even the iPhone 6s that already did 2015 Has come onto the market, Apple was still using the latest update iOS 15 provided.
In the same year, for example, that too Samsung Galaxy S6, the OnePlus 2 or that Xiaomi Mi 4i came on the market. All 3 devices came out with Android 5. For the OnePlus 2 there was a single system update to Android 6, then it was over.
The Samsung S6 received the update to Android 7 in spring 2017. After a final security update in autumn 2018, the device was no longer supplied with updates.
In the meantime, however, the Android manufacturers have also recognized that the longevity and the long-term software support possible decision criteria when buying a smartphone. Accordingly, they have improved the supply of updates.
However, they cannot come close to the long support that Apple offers. Cooperation with various chip manufacturers is a problem for Android manufacturers. MediaTek-Chips, Snapdragon processors or also the Exynos-Chips Bringing it into line with the in-house Android adaptations is no easy task.