The chats come mainly from Pertosi’s cell phone, one of those accused of the murder of the young man in January 2020. The messages They were the protagonists of the seventh hearing of the trial, in which a judicial official was in charge of reproducing them along with various images.
Although all this evidence – text messages, audios and images – was already incorporated into the case, it was the assistant to the General Prosecutor of Dolores Javier Pablo Laborde, in charge of analyzing the phones of the accused, who read each one of the messages that were simultaneously reproduced on a screen and that were closely followed by both Fernando’s parents and the eight young people who came to trial for the murder.
“I am here near where the kid is and they are all there yelling, the police are there, they called the ambulance… it expired,” said the audio that at 4:55 a.m., a few minutes after Fernando’s crime, the defendant Lucas sent Pertossi (23) to the rest of the defendants through the WhatsApp group “Los Boca3”, which all except Ayrton Viollaz (23) made up.
“We fought. We won against some cheetos, we broke them,” the rugby player Blas Cinalli (22) wrote at 5:08 a.m. to a contact outside that group, who until now had not been mentioned by the witnesses who testified in the trial.
The defendant himself was the one who also told other acquaintances: “I think we killed one”, “we hit one with the ‘perto’, we reloaded it with a stick, but badly. We ran home”, “we Let’s go to the beach. Previously at home, all the cats come” and “I just want to drink wine and smoke flowers”, according to the witness, who had to read those texts in front of Fernando’s parents, Graciela Sosa and Silvino Báez.
When asked by the complainant Fernando Burlando, Laborde confirmed that Cinalli’s expressions were written 13 minutes after he and the rest of the defendants received the message from Lucas Pertossi in the Whatsapp group that referred to the death of Báez Sosa.
The witness also referred to another exchange in which the defendant himself said that they were going to a McDonald’s, that they were “running” so they would not be seen, and described that as a result of the attack, other young people had been injured.
“Two convulsed, we sent one to the hospital, without vital signs. Now we are going to McDonald’s to see what happens,” Cinalli told a contact, who replied: “They are the demolishers.
“Laborde, who became the witness who testified for the longest hours before the Oral Criminal Court (TOC) 1 of Dolores -since it had started yesterday and continued in today’s hearing- carried out the analysis of the communications within the framework of the investigation, when summoned by the prosecutor of Instruction 6 of Villa Gesell, Verónica Zamboni.
Although the messages from Cinalli and Lucas Pertossi about Fernando’s death were the ones that caused the most commotion among those present in the courtroom, others that referred to the arrival of the police at the summer house rented by the rugbiers and one in which one of them warned the others: “Guys, nothing of this is told, to anyone.
“Among the phones analyzed is the black iPhone 3 of Máximo Thomsen (23), who refused to provide the access code; another five phones of the same brand that belonged to Lucas and Luciano Pertossi (21), Matías Benicelli (23) , Alejo Milanesi (22) and Juan Pedro Guarino (21), whose black “7 Plus” kit had a chipped screen and an All Blacks cover.
The expert reports also included the Motorola G4 Plus of Enzo Comelli (22), who was pointed out by witnesses as one of those who hit Fernando; a Huawei belonging to Cinalli and the gray Huawei BLL23 with a black case and chipped screen by Ciro Pertossi (22).
The only one from the group whose cell phone was not located in the raided home or in the two cars parked there was that of Viollaz, although he is not part of the “Del Boca3” group either, in which the rest of the defendants were, and also Guarino. and Milanesi, both dismissed in the case.
The numbers correspond to users identified as “Chano (Luciano), “Blas Croto” (Cinalli), “Mati Benicelli” (Benicellii), “Juampi” Guarino, “Alejo Milanesi”, “Ciro Perto”, “Machu (Thomsen), “Enzo Comelli”, “Lucas Perto” and a young man nicknamed “Salvi”, who was not identified in the investigation.
After the hearing, the victim’s mother referred to the chats of the defendants after the murder and maintained that “the testimonies are very strong”, since her “son had died and they were aware of it and were going to celebrate after he was dead, that they were going to get together, that they were going to be filled with wine and flowers on the beach”.
For his part, Burlando considered that what the messages sent was “very strong” and that although they knew each other in the case, “it is good that the judges observe the reactions of those present.”
Two expert witnesses also testified today who confirmed that Fernando had a 6 by 2 centimeter imprint in the lower part of his jaw, compatible with Thomsen’s shoe, and another on his neck, although in this case without being able to specify whether it corresponded to the same blow and footwear. Regarding the main injury, María Eugenia Cariac, an expert from the Scientific Police, indicated that “a correspondence” was established between her and the Cyclone brand shoe “with a zigzag design”, which Thomsen was wearing at the time of the attack, although she suggested ” a more in-depth test” to “corroborate if there was design correspondence”.
In this sense, Haydeé Almirón, head of the Scientific Laboratory of the Federal Police in Mar del Plata, expanded that another scopometric comparative expertise carried out at the end of May 2020, it was determined that “there is no possibility of error” and that “the staff that belongs to the citizen Máximo Thomsen corresponds to the print in the lower left jaw”.
