The same day that the trial of Daniel Sancho began in Thailand, the news broke: his father Rodolfo gives an interview on the HBO platform, specifically in episode zero of The Sancho Case, the real-time docuseries that recounts what happened with the murder and dismemberment of Edwin Arrieta last August on the island of Koh Phangan. Some somewhat controversial statements that quickly generated a great debate on social networks where many called the popular actor arrogant and arrogant.
The truth is that Rodolfo Sancho did not grant that interview for pleasure but for money, as confirmed by his spokesperson Carmen Balfagn on the program And Now Sonsoles. He has done it for money. The objective was to cover the economic need that a father has to try to save his son’s life. (…) Thailand is a bottomless pit. It is an expensive country and you have to pay, not only for Daniel’s food, but also for lawyers, legalizations, assistants and many other expenses, the criminologist revealed.
Despite these explanations, the protagonist of Sea of Plastic continues to be the object of all criticism. One of the fiercest is that of Frank Cuesta. The herpetologist has opened up about the Sancho Case on Javi Oliveira’s YouTube channel where He reviews Rodolfo Sancho, gives his opinion on the Thai laws of which he is well versed, and breaks a spear in favor of Silvia Bronchalo, mother of the accused.
What I saw on HBO is pure and simple arrogance, Frank Cuesta begins by saying after watching the first episode of the docuseries. The television broadcaster claims that he was shocked to hear how Rodolfo Sancho referred to Edwin Arrieta as a guy. I was amazed. You are talking about a person who you know that your son has killed him and has cut it into pieces. It is no longer empathy. There is no education. Trunk, if anyone sees that you say: like wood, like wood, he adds, visibly annoyed.
Regarding the figure of Silvia Bronchalo, Frank Cuesta admits to feeling empathy for her: She is quiet, she is always silent. The other day he said the same thing he said months ago: we have all lost here. Likewise, he regrets that the accused’s mother is going to eat the shit out of everything: On top of it they have it unfolded by the father and the son.
He predicts a dark future for Daniel Sancho
There are only two options: death penalty or life imprisonment (…) If you are playing balls and they give you a life sentence, you are very lucky. You’re going to get the death penalty, for sure.says Frank Cuesta, predicting a very dark future for Daniel Sancho in Thailand.
In addition, he is very critical of the strategy that the Spanish defense is carrying out. Every year the King commutes that death sentence, but maybe he doesn’t do it the first year or he doesn’t do it the second. You eat two more years in prison. The kid is on trial because he dismembered and killed another person. If I were Edwin’s family, I don’t even know what he would have done. Oysters! They cut off your brother! They cut it into pieces and threw it in the trash!, he adds.
I know the lawyer they had at the beginning. He is a guy with a great reputation at the criminal level. That guy could still get you a life sentence or whatever, but they will understand each other. They could reach an agreement with the prosecutor. What they did with Khun Anan was disrespectful. You don’t come to Thailand to be disrespectful, he insists on YouTube.
Lastly, Frank Cuesta assures that this was written six months ago and that he doubts that there will be a radical turn in the case. What they should have done is apologize, lower their heads and say I screwed up. Please don’t give me the death penalty, I’m going to be good and I’m embracing Buddhist culture, she concludes.
Follow the Diario AS channel on WhatsAppwhere you will find all the sport in a single space: the current news of the day, the agenda with the latest news of the most important sporting events, the most outstanding images, the opinion of the best AS brands, reports, videos, and some humor from time to time.
