Facebook was accused of allowing several companies, including Cambridge Analytica, access to the private data of its users.
The American giant Meta, owner of Facebook has agreed to pay 725 million dollars to end the lawsuit launched in 2018 claiming damages from the social network accused of having allowed third parties, including the company Cambridge Analytica, to have access to data. private to users.
“The 725 million proposed by the agreement constitutes the highest amount ever reached in a class action lawsuit on private data and ever paid by Facebook to end” this type of lawsuit, asserted the defense lawyers in a court document filed in a San Francisco court, released Thursday evening.
Facebook has admitted no infringement under the terms of this agreement which has yet to be approved by a judge in this court. The conclusion of a preliminary agreement was announced last August, without the amount or the terms of this agreement being revealed at the time.
Privacy Breach
It came as Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and chief executive Sheryl Sandberg, who announced her resignation in June after 14 years with the company, were due to testify in court in September in connection with the scandal.
In a procedure initiated in 2018, Facebook users accused the social network of having violated privacy protection rules by sharing their data with third parties, including the firm Cambridge Analytica, linked to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016.
Cambridge Analytica, which has since closed, had collected and used, without their consent, the personal data of 87 million Facebook users, to which the platform had given it access. This information would have been used to develop software used to guide the vote of American voters in favor of Donald Trump.
In July 2019, federal authorities fined Facebook $5 billion for “misleading” its users and imposed independent oversight of its handling of personal data.
Since the outbreak of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, Facebook has removed access to its data to thousands of applications, suspected of abusing it. The company also restricted the amount of information available to developers in general and made it easier for users to calibrate restrictions on sharing personal data.
