Cinthia Fernandez he is not a stranger to television fights that gradually escalate into the legal environment. The panelist has ended up several times entangled in legal trouble. Now, after interviewing Christian Sancho in “Nosotros a la Mañana”, a new section in this environment occurred when it was commented that the media would send him a document letter for a question that the panelist asked him.
Source: (The Thirteen)
Cinthia Fernandez He consulted him about an alleged alimony debt that the model owed to one of his exes and this aroused his anger and he replied that he was not going to talk “about me, my son or anyone.” Then he argued: “Justice ruled in my favor and I comply with what the court says.” “I am not going to talk because there are many women who are watching the program who, unfortunately, do not receive a similar figure, so I am not going to talk about money because the money I spend is a lot,” Sancho told the panelist.
But this situation did not end here, since it was learned that, supposedly, the presenter was going to send a document letter to the modelso she decided to share the situation in the networks in a very critical way. “He didn’t look so sweet when I asked him. Pollo Álvarez saved him because he doesn’t want our guests to feel uncomfortable”be sincere Cinthia Fernandez and added: “I wanted to ask about something interesting, which for me is the food quota, something that I suffer.”
“It is a public issue with his ex-wives because he had problems with both of them over the issue of the alimony. And the gentleman was so offended that he is going to send a document letter. He didn’t know there was censorship.”, said the panelist. In this context, she commented that the information had been shared directly with Sancho’s ex-partner. “He handed me a piece of paper where the Justice puts a temporary one because, According to my source, I would not be paying for food until November”, concluded the aspiring politician.
The lawyer’s response
For his part, Cynthia posted on his Instagram stories a statement made by his lawyer Roberto Castillo, who indicated that “there is no kind of illegal conduct.” “It is a simple interview, surely the interviewee did not like it because of its content,” said the lawyer.
He even claimed that “no person who submits to an interview, who directly or indirectly profits from the media, can claim to limit it to the molds of their convenience”.
