In recent weeks there have been allegations of congressmen of the Republic that they would be cutting the salaries of the workers in their offices. However, this practice, apart from being ethically questionable, could also lead to serious criminal penalties for all involved.
The president of the East Lima Court, Rose Mary Parra, pointed out that the State has anti-bribery policies to protect workers who wish to report this type of act that could have a sentence between two and eight years in effective prison. “The Law does not specify that the penalty is aggravated if the person who commits the crime of concussion is a high or medium official,” said the magistrate.
“State entities have anti-bribery or anti-corruption policies so that the worker can present anonymous or covert complaints so that officials can initiate the corresponding processes,” Parra added in a video broadcast by the Power of attorney on their social networks.
In addition, the magistrate of the East Lima Court He also warned that officials in the Human Resources area who hire personnel who do not meet the profile requested by the State entity would also be subject to criminal liability because they would be committing a crime.
“The head of the area can request or ask for a worker’s contract, but if the worker does not meet the established profile, the person who must ensure that the contract is not executed is the official or the manager of the human resources area, otherwise, the sanction will be directed directly at them”, he noted.
the legislator magaly ruiz was accused of having cut the salary of its workers through one of its trusted advisors, according to Punto Final.
Carlos Marina Puscan denounced that Johnny Romero Nima I asked them for their contribution in order to help the most vulnerable people. However, she would later have realized that this sum of money would reach the hands of the parliamentarian.
Ruiz denied it and decided to fire his adviser, but the National Prosecutor’s Office opened a preliminary investigation. For its part, APP decided to withdraw it from the Ethics Commission and the legislator requested a license in her party.
the parliamentarian rosio torres also she was involved in these contributions that were transferred to her nephew.
At least five former workers and workers carried it out, although some say they do not know the reason and prefer that the consultation be direct to Juan Daniel Pérez Guerra. When questioning the parliamentarian, she ignored the facts without imagining that she was being recorded from other angles.
Rosío Torres entered the chamber a little nervous and entered her nephew’s name on her mobile device. Immediately, she deleted all conversation and revealed that she had an “enemy” within her team.
