Harvard Board Votes to Keep Claudine Gay as President

Harvard University’s governing board has unanimously voted to keep Claudine Gay as president. The decision comes after Gay faced criticism for her testimony at a congressional hearing on antisemitism on college campuses. Her answer to a question about Harvard’s bullying and harassment policies led dozens of lawmakers to ask for her resignation.

The Harvard Corporation, the school’s highest governing body, issued a statement affirming its support for Gay. The statement said, “We recognize that there was disappointment in her testimony this past week. President Gay has pointed this out and apologized for any pain her testimony caused—a powerful demonstration of her integrity, determination, and courage”.

“As members of the Harvard Corporation, we today reaffirm our support for President Gay’s continued leadership of Harvard University,” the statement from the Harvard Corporation said. “Our extensive deliberations affirm our confidence that President Gay is the right leader to help our community heal and to address the very serious societal issues we are facing.”

The Harvard Corporation, the university’s top governance board, announced the decision Tuesday morning following the conclusion of the board’s meeting on Monday. The Harvard Crimson, the university’s student newspaper, was first to report the news Tuesday morning.

“In this tumultuous and difficult time, we unanimously stand in support of President Gay,” the Corporation added in its statement. But strong criticism of Gay remains, and the board’s statement of support may not be the final word on the matter.

Gay, the first Black president in Harvard’s nearly 400-year history, has been on the hot seat ever since her widely criticized testimony on antisemitism at American universities before a House committee a week ago. Since then, UPenn President Liz Magill, who testified alongside Gay, resigned, and some high-profile donors and politicians called for Gay’s ouster.

House GOP Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik, whose questioning at last week’s hearing led to the viral moments that landed the university presidents in hot water, blasted her alma mater for supporting its president Tuesday.

“There is a reason why the testimony at the Education Workforce Committee garnered 1 billion views worldwide. And it’s because those university presidents made history by putting the most morally bankrupt testimony into the Congressional Record And the world saw it,” Stefanik said at the weekly GOP leadership presser. “This is a moral failure of Harvard’s leadership and higher education leadership at the highest levels.”

Still, an outpouring of support for Gay Monday from hundreds of faculty and alumni could have tipped the board’s decision in her favor. More than 700 Harvard faculty members have signed a petition backing Gay. According to the 2023 Harvard annual report, the university has 1,068 tenured faculty plus 403 tenure-track faculty.

The Executive Committee of Harvard University’s Alumni Association on Monday announced its unreserved support for Gay. And over 800 Black alumni have announced their “unequivocal support” for Gay and her efforts to “build a stronger, more inclusive community at our alma matter while balancing the critical principals of free thought and free speech.”

“I’m glad the Corporation made their own decision to keep Claudine Gay rather than outsourcing it to others,” Harvard economic policy professor Jason Furman, who served as a top economic adviser to President Obama, told CNN in a statement Tuesday. “I also hope they are pressing Claudine Gay and schools to continue the process of fixing our mistakes and moving forward in a better way.”

At the consequential December 5 hearing before a House committee, Gay struggled to answer questions about whether calls for genocide against Jews would violate Harvard’s code of conduct. She and other university presidents failed to explicitly say calls for genocide of Jewish people constituted bullying and harassment on campus. The exchanges went viral and prompted a flurry of business leaders, donors and politicians to demand Gay, Magill and MIT President Sally Kornbluth step down.

The three presidents soon after attempted to clarify their testimony, publicly saying that they were giving academic answers to questions of safety, and they believe calls for genocide would violate school rules.

MIT’s board quickly said it supported Kornbluth. Gay apologized last week in an interview with the Crimson. Magill, who resigned along with Penn board chair Scott Bok, still has not apologized. In its statement, the Corporation said Gay should have been more firm in her response to the House committee’s questioning.

“So many people have suffered tremendous damage and pain because of Hamas’s brutal terrorist attack, and the University’s initial statement should have been an immediate, direct, and unequivocal condemnation,” it said in a statement. “Calls for genocide are despicable and contrary to fundamental human values. President Gay has apologized for how she handled her congressional testimony and has committed to redoubling the University’s fight against antisemitism.”

Harvard, like many other schools across the country, has encountered difficulty combating a rise in antisemitic incidents on campus following the terror attacks by Hamas on October 7 and Israel’s subsequent strikes on Gaza. Harvard is also among 14 colleges under investigation by the Department of Education since the attacks “for discrimination involving shared ancestry” an umbrella term that covers both Islamophobia and antisemitism.

New York Democratic Rep. Daniel Goldman told CNN Tuesday he’s disappointed by the decision and argued Harvard is failing to protect its students facing threats of violence.

“If they are unable to enforce their code of conduct, then they either need to get a new code of conduct or they need to get a new president,” Goldman said. “I hope there is a significant change at Harvard if Dr. Gay is going to stay.”

Ackman has also questioned Gay’s academic integrity and values, posting on social media content that implies Gay, who is the first Black woman to lead Harvard, was hired to fulfill diversity metrics. In his letter, he attacked Harvard’s diversity, equity and inclusion practices as a “major contributing source of discriminatory practices on campus.”

Ackman alleged Gay plagiarized elements of her academic writings, an accusation Gay denied. “I stand by the integrity of my scholarship,” Gay responded to the allegations in a statement. “Throughout my career, I have worked to ensure my scholarship adheres to the highest academic standards.”

The Harvard Corporation Tuesday said it ordered an independent review of Gay’s writings, which revealed inadequate citations in a few instances but “no violation of Harvard’s standards for research misconduct.”

“President Gay is proactively requesting four corrections in two articles to insert citations and quotation marks that were omitted from the original publications,” the Corporation said.

But the Harvard Crimson said it independently reviewed four of Gay’s articles that were alleged in a Washington Free Beacon report to have included plagiarized text, including a 1993 essay, Gay’s 1997 PhD dissertation, and papers she wrote in 2012 and 2017. The student paper said some of the issues with the pieces are “substantial, including some paragraphs and sentences nearly identical to other work and lacking citations.”

Some, the Crimson said, appear to violate Harvard’s current plagiarism policies.

California18

Welcome to California18, your number one source for Breaking News from the World. We’re dedicated to giving you the very best of News.

Leave a Reply