In the midst of a delicate legal and health situation, Jair Bolsonaro He defined the date on which he will leave the United States to return to Brazil as leader of the opposition to Lula da Silva. The right-wing politician confirmed, in a note he gave to the Wall Street Journal, that he will turn around in March.
Throughout the interview, the politician spoke of his stay in North American territory and stated that “the right-wing movement is not dead and will continue to be alive,” in addition to considering himself the “national leader” of that political sector, due to to the fact that “there is no one else capable, at this moment”, of taking his place. Thus, Jair Bolsonaro is preparing to return to Brazil again as one of the most visible faces of the opposition.
The former president He was accused by the prosecutors of the South American nation when he affirmed that he incited, with his posts on social networks, the invasion of Congress by his followers a week after his political rival took office. In accordance with Jair Bolsonaro“I wasn’t in Brazil when that happened and they want me to take over.” Also, he minimized the coup attempt. “What hit? Where was the commander? Where were the troops? Where were the bombs?” he told the newspaper.
But this isn’t the only legal problem he runs into. Jair Bolsonaroas it is in the middle of a civil lawsuit for its mishandling of the coronavirus pandemic. During the interview, he commented that he should not have referred to it as a “little flu” and “should have let the Ministry of Health take care of it.” He even explained that the comments about vaccines turning people into crocodiles was a way of saying “”.
Bolsonaro spoke of the elections
One of the reasons why his name was on everyone’s lips was due to his opinion on possible electoral fraud and not having recognized his defeat after the elections, in addition to leaving the country hours before his successor was to take office.
On the subject, he indicated: “I am not saying that there was fraud, but the process was biased,” which implies that he maintains his idea, although he acknowledged that “losing is part of the electoral fact”.
