The Impeachment Commission of the Chamber of Deputies of the Nation convened a new meeting next Tuesday in which it will receive testimonies for the denunciations of irregularities of the social work of the Judiciary and summoned the former director of that organization, Aldo Tonónwho did not attend the last call.
Complaints about irregularities in the social work of the Judiciary is another of the issues used by the ruling party to support the process of Impeachment of the members of the Supreme Court, in addition to the co-participation of the City of Buenos Aires, the rulings of the 2×1 and the repeal of the law on the Council of the Magistracy.
The Commission, chaired by the deputy of the Frente de Todos, Caroline Gaillard, summoned new witnesses for next Tuesday at 1:00 p.m. and summoned Tonón again, who did not testify the last time, alleging -through a letter- that he will not express himself because he has causes in Justice. His testimony before the legislators “could infringe and violate the guarantee in the text of article 18 of the National Constitution,” he explained and for this reason he asked that it be given to him. “exempt from declaring”.
They were also called the university professor, Gustavo Montanini; the legal secretary of the Supreme Court, Sebastian Clerici; the attorney secretary of the Court, Enrique DeVedia; the legal doctor, Enzo Canonaco; and affiliates Valeria Diaz and Laura Ambrosio.
The OSPJN provides health services to the personnel of federal and national courts throughout the country and depends functionally and administratively on the Supreme Court of Justice. The Impeachment Committee seeks to verify whether manifest irregularity by not filling the vacancies in the board of directors of the social work, in the medical sub-directorate, administrative sub-directorate and internal audit, and if as a result of the non-appointment of these people the statutory authorization for the signature delegation was not complied with, informed sources of the low camera. In addition, an alleged absence of budget forecast and will seek to advance on irregularities in accounting records.
Within this framework, the Commission will take into account the complaint filed by the Civic Coalition that originally filed Elisa “Lilita” Carrió against Ricardo Lorenzetti for “poor performance in the exercise of their functions and possible commission of crimes for irregular and discretionary management of social work”, and their “incidence” due to the lack of coverage of vacancies in the board of directors and in different administrative areas.
Kirchnerism advances in its onslaught against the Court, focusing on the conduct of the four court ministers, Carlos Rosenkrantz, Juan Carlos Maqueda, Lorenzetti, and their president Horacio Rosattiwho are accused of poor performance of their duties.
This Thursday Rosatti, Rosenkrantz and Maqueda signed an agreement to displace the administrator of the Court, Daniel Marchi, for a report on the social work of the Judiciary. Lorenzetti voted in dissent.
The resolution ordered the transfer of Marchi to the Federal Chamber of Social Security and in his place the current head of the Judicial Secretariat No. 1 was temporarily appointed, Damian Ignacio Font. In addition, the Social Security Chamber was informed that once Marchi leaves office, he must refrain from filling the vacancy and the position must return to the Court.
as he was able to reconstruct infobaeOn Wednesday, a request from the Political Judgment Commission reached the Highest Court asking Rosatti to send the successive audits that Marchi carried out on the social work of the Judiciary. As a result of that request, Marchi sent Rosatti a note in which he pointed out the different reports that he presented, also indicating that only one of those reports was published and the rest remains on file without being publicly disclosed. In that note, the former administrator told Rosatti that in accordance with the request made by Congress, he should send all those reports – the published and the unpublished – to the Impeachment Commission. From there, the accountant’s fate seemed to be sealed.
With information from Telam Agency.
Keep reading:
