The fiscal Mariana Albisu who performs functions in the decentralized prosecutor’s office of Brandsen and integrates the judicial department of La Plata gave his version in relation to the impeachment request promoted by a lawyer for an alleged obstruction of the right to defense. The magistrate did it through her defense attorney Dario Saldano who spoke with 0221.com.ar.
The lawyer’s complaint Damian Barbosa they point to the prosecutor for hinder, hinder and complicate the access of a lawyer to a criminal case to defend a defendantas can be seen from the complaint filed with the Secretariat for the Prosecution of Magistrates, where its analysis will begin.
“Dr. Albisu ordered in March to initiate ex officio proceedings before the alleged commission of a crime of public action, regarding the action carried out by the lawyer Damián Barbosa to investigate him for the alleged falsification of the signature of a person who is on the runSaldaño asserted and detailed: “At the beginning of the case, a lawyer appears with the designation signed by the person, A few days later, Barbosa presented his appointment as defender of the same person with a signature very different from that of the first lawyer. Given this scenario, the prosecutor ordered that the signatures be investigated and excused himself from continuing in the case.”.
THE COMPLAINT
As detailed in the complaint that the lawyer Barbosa presented before the Secretariat for the Prosecution of Magistrates, from the prosecutor’s office in charge of Albisu They repeatedly prevented him from accessing a criminal case. “Nobody denounced me or notified me of anything,” said the lawyer Barbosa to this medium.
“One as a lawyer does not need anything to see a cause, the hearing is requested and that’s it, she began to put requirements that do not exist, she always looked for the hair of the egg, a certified signature was presented before a notary public and sent him to investigate, crazy, ”complained the complainant lawyer.
Barbosa asserted that “in the prosecution I provided documentation of everything I denounced” and asserted that when the investigation changed prosecutors “they accepted my position in five minutes.” The concrete thing is that there is a request for impeachment that must be analyzed and an ongoing investigation for the possible adulteration of a firm in which no one is charged at the moment.
