The royals seem to be fine with Meghan Markle attending the coronation of King Charles III. not attended. Or did she even help?
London – For the organizers of the coronation is with Meghan Markles (41) cancellation a big problem disappeared. Their appearance, whether intentional or not, would have magically attracted any camera and raised security questions. As all the attention on his big day, however, King Charles III. (74) applies, the Duchess of Sussex no longer has to be “hidden”. Former BBC reporter Tom Bower (76) expresses himself in an exclusive interview Page Six clearly.
“Everyone’s glad she (Meghan Markle) isn’t coming,” says Bower
“I think everyone’s glad she’s not coming,” says Bower and exaggerates to get his point across: “They made sure she didn’t come by telling her she had to curtsey three times, that she won’t be in the spotlight, that she won’t have any part in the whole thing and that if she comes, she’ll be in Row 54 will sit at the back behind the pillar.” Nevertheless, Meghan is Prince Harry’s (38) wife and the royals can’t tell her face what they really think.
Then the procedure would have been tactical? Very early on, a planner apparently set May 6th as the coronation date. It was no secret at the time that it was Archie’s birthday. Should this give Meghan an opportunity to save face from the start to avoid having to come to London? The “Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the War Between the Windsors” author cannot prove this. But the fact is that the historic event falls on the same day as Archie’s birthday.
Sarah Ferguson (63) was not even invited as Prince Andrew’s divorced wife
Another member of the royal family who will not be present is Sarah Ferguson, ex-wife of Prince Andrew, 63, although she was friends with Charles and Camilla before marrying Andrew and has their two daughters Princess Beatrice, 34 ) and Princess Eugenie (33) are invited.
The writer shared that she wasn’t offended that she wasn’t on the guest list.
“You can’t have both. You must not sit between the chairs. You’re either in or you’re not,” the Duchess of York, who divorced Andrew in 1996, said on Good Morning Britain.
Meghan’s non-appearance is apparently in the interest of both parties
Meghan Markle found it “inauthentic,” reports Page Six further exclusive to go to the coronation given the drama that followed her and Harry’s royal departure in 2020. “They had to make a decision that feels real and authentic, especially after all the accusations and reactions, what was said and what happened,” says an insider who appears to be familiar with the family.
What Prince Harry and Meghan said about the importance of their family was consistent with their actions. “They care about their family, so Meghan will stay in California and Harry will support his father,” it said. It was originally believed that Meghan was simply trying to avoid being booed as the Duchess and Duke of Sussex’s popularity had plummeted following Prince Harry’s Spare, their Netflix documentary Harry and Meghan and various interviews. Charles III Anyway, seems happy with his guest list, he even sent Meghan a small peace sign. Sources used: pagesix.com, express.co.uk
