He Wanda Nara’s health status has practically become a vox populi in Argentina. The television presenter and model had to be admitted to the hospital urgently due to stomach pain a few weeks ago and, even, some well-known faces on national television pointed out that he could have leukemia.
However, since that July 14 Jorge Lanata made public the supposed diagnosis that Mauro Icardi’s partner had received, the entire environment has remained silent about it. Fourteen days later, taking advantage of a trip to Paris with her children and her husband, Wanda Nara has done a question and answer session on Instagram with which she wanted to update her state of health.
There have been many questions from users concerned about the health of Argentina. “How are you, Wanda? We want to know how your health is. I send you lots of kisses and love,” a follower asked. “I’m very well,” replied Nara, who in another story expanded her diagnosis. “Many lies were told. They speak and assure things that are not true without measuring that they are talking about the life of another “.
A situation carried out in privacy
A few days after leaving the hospital, Wanda Nara made a statement on her Instagram account explaining what had happened and regretting the treatment she had received from Lanata. “On Wednesday I decided on my own to have a routine analysis, as I usually do every time I travel or once a year. Some values went wrong and I made the decision to enter the hospital to complement it with other check-ups that went well”, he began.
His concerns, up to that moment, had been left out of his children “because he did not have an accurate diagnosis.” However, Lanata’s statements reached the ears of the little ones before the presenter. “My children always found out everything from me, I always spoke and this was not going to be the exception. But I would have chosen to do it with more results and studies in hand. And, above all, with more time”, he settled before assuring that his state of health would be a matter that he would keep “in his privacy”.
