Harvard researcher says he reversed his age by 10 years (with some curious methods)

A researcher at Harvard University claims to have reversed his own aging with some simple methods and claims that his DNA registers 43 years of biological age – despite being 53.

Some well-known drugs promise to increase human life expectancy, and recent studies have paved the way in recent years for the possibility of completely slowing down aging.

However, David Sinclaira molecular biologist and professor in the Department of Genetics at Harvard University, claims to have been able to reverse your own aging — following a few simple methods.

In statements to InsiderSinclair says he managed to make his body age more slowly – and that, according to components of his DNA that reflect the aging process, his biological age is only 43 years olddespite being born 53 years ago.

Sinclair advances that his “secret methods” to age slower do not require any type of surgery. Just a few supplements, less stress It is intermittent fasting to help you lower your biological age.

Sinclair’s methods are very simple: make aerobic exercises at least three times a week, drinking green tea once or twice a day, taking some supplements with resveratrol (a compound that is alleged to help slow the aging of organs in the human body), and intermittent fasting.

Finally, the last age-reversing step that Sinclair says he took to help slow his aging is avoid idiots and rude people whenever possible – what helps reduce stress and decrease your biological age.

While each of these methods may have some health benefit, there is still no conclusive studies that prove its real benefits to delay aging — and its actual effects on increasing human longevity have yet to be definitively proven.

In addition, recent studies point to harmful health effects in some of Sinclair’s methods. In November, a study concluded that intermittent fasting can increase the risk of premature death by 30%; and in December, another concluded that too much green tea can cause catastrophic liver damage.

Sinclair’s methods should therefore not be taken as medical advice.

But the truth is, if David Sinclair’s recent photos haven’t been Photoshopped, Time seems to have been kind with the investigator. Some or all of his methods seem to be working.

And in the absence of conclusive data on the effectiveness of the rest, at least the “avoiding idiots” method is not harmful to health.