The coach in the post match justifies the team by comparing it in terms of values to the Cremonese. Instead, everyone should recite the mea culpa
It’s amazing how the Turin punctually manages to complicate life, to throw away point after point. In this beginning of 2023 he has collected just three (the result of as many draws) against teams such as Verona, Salernitana, Spice And Cremona, all formations engaged in the fight not to relegate. Indeed, as far as yesterday’s opponents are concerned, no one will be offended if we say that at this point of the season they have one foot in Serie B: no wins in the league, just nine points won (including yesterday’s) and 42 goals conceded . That’s why the way the second half has been interpreted is something to eat, for the half hour of play given away to the opponents who were able to momentarily overturn the result.
Ivan’s justifications don’t hold up either Juric who, at the end of the game, tried to explain that there isn’t this big difference from a technical point of view between Turin and Cremonese. No Juric, this time you’re wrong: perhaps the only one Carnesecchi he could be a regular in Turin, of all the outfield players there isn’t only one who would play as a starter in the granata lineup. Cremonese does not have SchuursHe has not Miranchuk, didn’t even spend 16 million in January for a reinforcement in midfield like Torino did with Ilic. One of the Grigiorossi’s best outfield players, Dessers, didn’t even get off the bench yesterday due to an injury. He is right Juric when he complains about the gaps in his squad (it is evident that, for example, a striker is missing), he is also right when he explains that the players are not figurines and that if players like Belotti, Bremer or Pobega it is not enough to take any one to replace them, but he is wrong when he compares Turin to Cremonese. Games like last night have to be won and that’s it. If they are thrown away, there is only a mea culpa to recite.
