One can have no truly constructed ideology, nor any structured thought, but talk about it with a conviction anchored in the body. This Monday evening, January 30, railing against the president of the court who wants at all costs to give her the floor when she has a train to catch, and clearly not realizing that she faces ten years in prison, Nathalie C. goes straight to the point. Fifty-five years old, domestic worker in Moselle, mother of three children, she places her rocker “in 2015, with the attacks, when François Hollande said: ‘We are at war'”. She then says to herself “that there is something wrong in France” with the terrorist attacks committed by “migrants, irregulars, undocumented”. She had “rabies”the certainty that “The state was not going to protect us”that” there’s [avait] a failure “. She wants – since she speaks in the present now – “that we don’t let happen anymore”that“we defend ourselves if there is civil war” and that we “can still drink a coffee on the terrace without getting knocked out”.
An ill-defined terrorist project
With her crude speech, Nathalie C., who is considered by the courts to be one of the leaders of the ultra-right Barjols group, alone illustrates all the embarrassments of the trial. The hearing, which began on January 17 before the Paris Criminal Court, stretches interminably around an ill-defined terrorist project to which it will be necessary to bring a judicial truth.
This article is for subscribers only. Take advantage of our special offers without obligation.
WHERE
Google Exclusive: 6.99€/month
<
By choosing this promotional subscription path, you accept the deposit of an analysis cookie by Google.
