Whether due to her halo effect, her famous family or the macabre of the event, The Daniel Sancho case continues to be analyzed with a magnifying glass in all television programsfrom the pink chronicle to the black one, after learning a month and a half ago that the son of actor Rodolfo Sancho had confessed to the murder of Colombian plastic surgeon Edwin Arrieta in Thailand.
Well, with the investigation already closed by the police of the Asian country, it is time for action for the defense of the Spanish chef, diminished after the resignation of the local lawyer who was handling the case. The young man’s lawyers must now study all the aspects of the case to avoid the death penalty, since the Thai authorities consider that it is a premeditated murder, and that is the punishment in the country for this type of crime. crimes.
One of the details that the defense of Sancho Gracia’s grandson could cling to is the return ticket that the young man would have bought to return to Spain from his vacation in Thailand. The date of this ticket is for August 23half a month after the murder occurred, which could indicate that what finally happened to the Latin American doctor was not among the chef’s plans, ergo, there would have been no premeditation.
The opinion of an expert
The professor of Criminal Law Emilio Cortés analyzed last night on the program laSexta Xplica as could influence the date of this bill in the factor of premeditation of the murder, which took place on August 5.
“In right, It all depends on the lens you look through.. It could also be said that it was a kind of trick on his part to precisely not justify that premeditation,” she said. And he stated that for the authorities, “those previous acts that were causally predetermined to produce the result of death, regardless of whether he had a ticket, or whether he did not have one,” will be key in the trial of the crime.
