The Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported that he delivered a note to the ambassador of bolivian in Peru, Carlos Aparicio, for statements by the president of that country, Luis Arcein which he referred to “internal political issues.”
“In Peru, where we have the Peruvian people in a fight to recover their democracy and also for recovering the right to elect a government that represents them,” commented the bolivian president in an activity in his country, on January 22.
This pronouncement by Arce upset the Peruvian Foreign Ministry and motivated me to send that note to transmit “an energetic protest” and make it known that it is “evaluating actions” in the face of “new acts of interference”.
It may interest you: Crisis in Peru LIVE: riots in Ica and march in Lima, while road blockades continue
Today, the Ministry of Foreign Relations delivered a note to the Bolivian Ambassador through which it conveys an energetic protest against the statements of President Luis Arce on domestic policy issues. The Foreign Ministry evaluates actions before new acts of interference.
– Chancellery Peru ?? (@CancilleriaPeru) January 23, 2023
The portfolio, led from the beginning of this government by the diplomatic Ana Cecilia Gervasireleased this news through his official Twitter account.
This is not the first time that there are discrepancies between Peru and some other South American countriesin the middle of the social mobilizations and the rejection of the population to its political class.
At the beginning of January of this year, the National Superintendence of Migrations ordered the impediment of the former Bolivian president from entering Peru Evo Moralesafter being accused of spreading his political discourse in our territory.
He also had friction with Mexico due to the president’s constant comments Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO) in favor of Pedro Castillo and grant political asylum to the former first lady, Lilia Paredes, and her two youngest children.
In addition, the first Alberto Otárola responded through social networks to the president of Colombia, Gustavo Petrofor criticizing the government of Dina Boluarte for the police intervention on the campus of the Universidad Mayor de San Marcos.
“Mind your business, Mr. Petro. The Permanent Council of OAS it could also examine massacres that occurred during his rule. The last in the putumayo. Govern for yours, assist the victims, improve your universities,” Otárola wrote.
for the internationalist Fabian Fencesthe Peruvian prime minister’s response “is well put” because Colombia has “quite urgent” problems regarding human rights within its own country.
“There is a principle within the States that is governed and is called the Estrada Doctrine, which was practiced by South American countries. Estrada by the name of a Mexican foreign minister who in the last century determined that countries are governed by non-intervention in internal affairs ”, he affirmed.
“It is still strange to me that it has not been perceived that there is a international conspiracy against Peru, which was reflected in a series of events. First, the pronouncements of four heads of state who did not recognize President Dina Boluarte and did recognize former president Pedro Castillo,” said the former Peruvian foreign minister. Luis Gonzales Posada.
“Second, the narrative that they launched in the sense that the Peruvian aristocracy had thrown him out of power for being indigenous, poor and a teacher, which involved the leaders of Argentina, MexicoColumbia and bolivian, and the same argument spread throughout the region. So, it is clear that there is a conspiracy, ”he said.
KEEP READING:
