One of the most successful premieres of Netflix in recent weeks has been the premiere of The body on firea series based on the murder of agent Pedro Rodríguez. Furthermore, the fiction has coincided with the debut of the documentary on the same platform. Rosa Peral’s ribbonswhose argument consists of the first interview from prison of the police officer convicted of the death of her ex-partner.
A few days ago, Peral’s lawyer denied having requested financial compensation in the form of copyright from the platform, but she did claim to be studying taking legal action for the violation of some fundamental rights of both her client and her client. For his part, Rodríguez’s lawyer asked the Barcelona Court that all alleged income that Rosa Peral and Albert López could generate -the other person convicted of the murder- were to go to the victim’s family as compensation. compensation.
Justice has finally accepted the request of the representative of Pedro Rodríguez and will retain all the money they may receive in a judicial bank account those convicted of the well-known crime of the Urban Police. Furthermore, according to the Daily Monththe producers will have to communicate if they have already paid any amount to Rosa Peral for either of the two productions.
They did not pay compensation
Rosa Peral and Albert López were sentenced respectively to 25 and 20 years in prison, in addition to paying compensation to Rodríguez’s family of 885,000 euros. The aforementioned newspaper points out that López has his apartment seizedwhile Peral has only paid 1,775 euros. In addition, the victim’s ex-partner changed the ownership of the property where the crime occurred so that his father was the sole owner and thus declared himself insolvent.
Peral’s defense asked when he learned that he was preparing The body on fire that the series was not released. He did so first in a court in Barcelona, which rejected the request, considering that it fell within the jurisdiction of the court in Vilanova i la Geltrú, the town where the murder occurred and was investigated. However, When the convicted woman’s lawyer went to that instance, her request was also denied.
