For the moment, “there is a mass which is calm and determined”, underlines the ecologist deputy from Paris.
So far, the various inter-union mobilizations against the pension reform proceed without major incident. The executive is therefore not in a position to denounce a possible radicalization of this social movement and is obliged to recognize its extent.
According to Sandrine Rousseau, interviewed on BFMTV-RMC, “the government must take responsibility for this”.
“I think that if he persists in his confinement and his inability to understand that this reform is extremely massively rejected by the French and the French women, then yes, it is possible that part of the movement will be radicalized”, warns the ecologist deputy of Paris.
“Does it take excess, violence and aggressiveness to be heard?”
For the moment, “there is a mass which is calm and determined”, she underlines in stride. For their part, the unions want to put the executive in the face of contradictions. At the “peak of their mobilization, the yellow vests gathered 284,000 people with unfortunately too much violence from some people”, but “answers have been provided”, recalls Laurent Berger, boss of the CFDT, in The cross.
Tuesday, January 31, “1.27 million people peacefully refused the reform in the street”, he underlines to better legitimize the demands of the social movement.
“What would be the prospect if [ces personnes] didn’t get a response? Do we need excess, violence and aggressiveness to be heard?”, he asks, still in The cross.
“It’s not a threat”, then defends Laurent Berger, nevertheless considering that we “can only respond to this social tension by the democratic exercise of power”. According to him, “this also involves listening to society.”
