He Prosecutor Félix Martín, in charge of representing the public entity during the trial of Rosa Peral and Albert López for the death of Pedro Rodríguezhas spoken about one of the most media topics of recent days: the premiere of the documentary Rosa Peral’s ribbons and Netflix. The collaborator of the Cadena SER program If it dawns we’ll leave has charged against the production of the project for its inconsistencies and for have served to ensure that the condemned woman’s entourage is taking advantage of the media loudspeaker to resume her defense.
“My severe disagreement with the documentary is deontological and another methodological. First because I was told that it was going to be done in a different way than what was finally done. And second, they only focus on the subjective opinion of someone convicted of murder. In this context, not explaining that there was also another person convicted makes it seem that Rosa was the only one judged severely,” Martín pointed out.
Her defense in recent days is directed towards the proposition that she is suffering a “triple punishment.” She defends her innocence while she regrets the public ridicule of those who call her a “murderer” and denounces the situation that her daughter is experiencing when she is exposed both in fiction and in the media. Media in which his father has also appeared highlighting the “barbarities” of ‘The Body on Fire’.
Possibilities of reopening the trial
Rosa López was sentenced as guilty by the popular jury with a vote of eight votes in favor and one against, while Albert López received seven condemning votes for two acquittals. The version supported by the verdict indicates that the two were necessary collaborators in the death of Pedro Rodríguez and that they both took the phone near her ex-husband’s house to try to blame him. before burning the body in his car. However, Rosa Peral’s ribbons It only focuses the focus on the figure of Peral.
Rosa Peral’s lawyers and family are trying to invalidate the testimony of her ex-husband’s current partner and to take into consideration the statement of Rosa’s brother, who was the one with whom she went to the police station on the day of her arrest. “This may surprise listeners, But what if I told you that all the parties, including Mrs. Peral’s defense, proposed Antonia as a witness? (…) They give it secondary importance to consider that Mr. Pedro could not defend himself when they attacked him.”
A few days ago, in addition, the director of the documentary acknowledged having hidden information from a large part of the protagonists involved in the piece. Not even Martin himself, Nor did other journalists specialized in the case know about Peral’s participation in a work whose impartiality was questioned.
Final reflection
As a final reflection after his intervention, Félix Martín acknowledged being satisfied with the “reaction” of different sectors of society. “I think that we citizens have to have the critical capacity to not assert a documentary for a single vision. We cannot give prominence to a person convicted by a final sentence. There must be an extra responsibility,” he concluded.
