The investigation for the attack on Cristina Kirchner had news in the last hours: after the declaration of one of the secretaries of the national deputy gerardo milman saying that in an office of the pre-candidate president of the PRO Patricia Bullrich they erased his cell phone, the prosecutor Carlos Rivolo He requested the secrecy of the summary. It was clear to supporters of the cause that there might be news. It all happened tonight: staff from the Airport Security Police (PSA) sought out Milman’s other secretary, Carolina Gomez Monaco, former Security official during the macrismo, to kidnap a second phone, they confirmed to infobae close to the young woman.
The procedure was done in an office in the Obelisco area, on Corrientes and Cerrito. A dozen agents waited for her and when the young woman went out into the street, they informed her that there was a court order to withhold her cell phone. This is a decision handed down in the case brought by the judge Maria Eugenia Capuchetti and the prosecutor Rívolo to clarify the attempted murder of the vice president that took place on September 1.
The thing is Ivana Bohdziewicz, The other secretary who was a witness in this case together with Gómez Mónaco, appeared last Friday in court to advance an extension of her statement to the prosecution: it was to confirm that she had deleted her phone because she did not want her intimate photos to be leaked and that for this he had been advised. But she revealed that everything happened in the offices of Patricia Bullrich, where she went with Gómez Mónaco and where Milman and an expert were waiting for her. There she also said that Gómez Mónaco had a second cell phone and that she had felt pressured by her former friend in recent days.
Bodziewicz’s statement, which was detailed in the case last Monday – as detailed infobae– generated immediate reactions. President Cristina Kirchner insisted that there is a political leg behind her attack, while Patricia Bullirch rejected a link to the attack. “They no longer know what to invent in the face of the total and utter failure of their pathetic co-government. With me, on December 10, Kirchnerism ends, ”she said.
It may interest you Attack on CFK: Milman’s secretary declared that they deleted the photos from her cell phone in an office of Patricia Bullrich
In the meantime, in the case the summary secrecy was imposed. No one could know what was happening. He transcended, however, that the complaint decided to challenge the prosecutor Rívolo accusing him of loss of objectivity. It was what the vice president’s lawyers had been advertised in some media. Until now, the criticisms and challenges had been directed only at the judge. But now the questioning was because it would have been leaked that Milman’s secretary intended to testify. Rívolo was abroad when everything happened.
Tonight, however, a journalist on Twitter announced that the PSA was hijacking Gómez Mónaco’s phone. infobae He was able to confirm the information with those close to the young woman. The case, until tonight, remains under summary secrecy.
Gómez Mónaco and Bohdziewicz, legislative advisers to the deputy, became witnesses in the case as a result of the statement made by Jorge Abello, legislative adviser to the Frente de Todos, who declared three weeks after the attempted murder in court something he had heard in the Casablanca bar, a few meters from the Congress, 48 hours before the attack. “When they kill her, I’m going to be on the coast,” Abello said Milman said. He also claimed that he was with two women who were identified and brought to testify.
With nuances, the women said that they had not been in that bar. With the videos, they accepted or remembered having been. But they stressed that Milman never said that. The complaint asked to kidnap their phones and the judge did not validate it. That opened the chapter of challenges to Capuchetti. The Federal Chamber validated the judge but with restrictions and given the seriousness of the case, it agreed to advance in the investigation of the telephones.
Gómez Mónaco and Bohdziewicz appeared at the prosecutor’s office on December 1, confirmed that they had never heard that phrase, and handed over their equipment. But with a clarification: Gómez Mónaco had changed the device and Bohdziewicz had said that he had taken advice and had deleted his material for fear that intimate photos of him would leak into the press. “I took advice, but I decided it alone, of my own free will. My fear is the media,” he said.
What changed now was a third statement. Bohdziewicz appeared with a lawyer in court asking to expand the statement. They set a date for her, May 10, because the prosecutor would be traveling, but on Friday the 5th she asked to speak now because she felt pressured. by whom? By Gómez Monaco that she sent him insistent messages. What did she say? That that day in Casablanca she was only there for two minutes and she did not ask for a coffee, that she never knew anything about the attack and that on November 10 she had been summoned by her then friend to a cafe.
“Carolina said that she should put her batteries together, that she give us support that nothing would calm down with the World Cup, and He tells me that Milman told him that he had spoken with Patricia and that he was going to send us an expert to see the information that the cell phones had because it was likely that our information would leak. Not to delete something on time”he declared. From there they went by subway to an office on Avenida de Mayo at 900, from the institute linked to Patricia Bullrich.
“We got there, there was no one, there was only Milman with the expert, whose name I don’t remember, but he was dark-haired, big, about 60 years old, dressed in civilian clothes, I don’t remember if he was with a cane. There was no one else. While we were there, at that moment, we found out from Milman, I don’t know if lawyers or what, that they had requested the confiscation of our cell phones. He never said who informed him. And at that very moment I gave him my phone and he was analyzing it and he decides to delete everything. I was worried about my personal life, at that time the media was quite active, so they decided to delete everything and I agreed. I also did not think it was going to be so serious and it was going to hurt me to do it ”. The woman stressed that she was fired on January 2 and that she has had trouble finding work ever since.
The woman said that her friend had intentionally decided to change the phone and that she had a second line that she did not declare. And in her case, she affirmed that everything that she believed had been deleted from the phone appeared days later, when she got a new cell phone. “Wasn’t it that the expert had erased everything?” he said to himself. “So I talk to Carolina, I tell her what happened that my backup copy is downloaded, Carolina talks to her lawyer and there we decided to make everything available to Justice and I decided to hand it over. That was in the middle of December.” So it was done.
The telephones have already been seized and analyzed and for the moment no references to the attack have been found, they indicated to infobae the sources consulted.
All this situation is unleashed in the file when the complaint must give an opinion if the cause is brought to trial. At least the section that has detainees Fernando Sabag Montiel, the author of the attempted murder of CFK, his girlfriend Brenda Uliarte and the chief of both, Nicholas Carrizo, the so-called boss of the drinks, who is accused of being a secondary participant in the attempted murder that took place on September 1. Cristina Kirchner’s lawyers Marcos Aldazabal and José Manuel Ubeira They have already requested two extensions to answer that it expires in the next few days.
Keep reading
