This Monday, January 9, M6 broadcast the exclusive interview with Prince Harry granted to American television, more precisely to the CBS channel. An interview in which he clashed with his mother-in-law, Camilla Parker, explaining how she was “dangerous” for the royal family.
Like every week, Xavier de Moulins was at the helm of the 19:45 on M6. At the end of the newspaper, Prince Harry’s exclusive interview with journalist Anderson Cooper on CBS aired. An interview in which Meghan Markle’s husband opened up with an open heart and returned to his stormy relationship with his brother, Prince William, the day before the release of his memoir baptized in French, The Alternate. “We love each other, I love him deeply, but there has been a lot of pain between us, especially over the past six years. But nothing I’ve written or said is meant to harm the family, but it does give a full picture of what happened during our childhood and also shows that it’s not is not my wife which would have destroyed the relationship between the brothers“, he explained.
Camilla Parker Bowles, “she was the bad guy“
In this interview, Anderson Cooper pointed out that Prince Harry paints a portrait “unflattering“of Camilla Parker Bowles, his stepmother, now queen consort and whom his father married in 2005. Together they enjoyed a romantic relationship”intermittent” for several years. Lady Diana had moreover described her as “third person” in his marriage. A confidence that Prince Harry has never been able to forget. “She was the villain, she was the third person of the couple, she had to rebuild her image“, he said. With his brother, he asked his father not to marry him. To them it didn’t seem like “necessary“. “We wanted him to be happy, we saw how happy he was with her so that was enough“, he continued.
The continuation under this advertisement
Camilla Parker Bowles’ links with the British press
In his memoirs, Prince Harry writes “that she launched a campaign in the British press to pave the way for a marriage“.”I even wanted Camilla to be happy, maybe she would be less dangerous if she was happy“, he wrote afterwards. “How was she dangerous?“, asked the American journalist. “She had to rebuild her image. She was dangerous because of the links she made with the British press and both parties were ready to exchange information and in a family that relies on hierarchy, with her on the path to becoming queen consort, it would kill“, he replied.
