King Charles III apparently wanted to celebrate grandson Archie in his speech at the coronation dinner for his birthday. But maybe Prince Harry is already on his way back.
London – Since Prince Harry (38) his coming to the coronation of his father King Charles III. (47) has announced, while wife Meghan Markle (41) with their two children Archie (3) and Lilibet (1) stays in Montecito at home, a big question mark for the coronation planners has been settled. Grandpa Charles might think less pragmatically about the matter, he would certainly have liked to have had his grandson with him on his big day. Since Archie is also celebrating his fourth birthday on the historic coronation day, Meghan will probably hang up his birthday lanterns in the Sussexes’ villa.
No toast at lunch to little Archie Mountbatten-Windsor’s 4th birthday
A royal source has loud Express across from Mail on Sunday reports that Charles, as a loving father and grandfather, also wanted to use this special day of his historic coronation to raise a glass at the coronation luncheon and toast the well-being of his grandson Archie. Since celebrating in the absence of the Sussex family seems pointless, he would now have changed his speech. Because apparently not even Prince Harry is present at lunch or at least hasn’t decided yet whether he’s coming or whether he’d rather be on his way back to his family in the United States.
Prince Harry is unlikely to stay after the ceremony, and he may return straight home without dining with the rest of the royal family, sources said. One doesn’t have to be a psychic to imagine that there are more pleasant meetings than answering people’s questions or even being subjected to their stares or dismissive looks when one has recently churned out full-bodied literary accusations in book form. But that Express according to Harry, he delayed confirming whether he would be attending the coronation for an entirely different reason.
A source told the Mail on Sunday: “The king was considering toasting Archie.”
He would have been concerned about the recognition and appreciation of his children, which were apparently not considered in the official invitation by e-mail. As he explained in detail in “Spare”, Harry is already cold on the subject of unequal treatment, since Prince Williams (40) children are supposed to play important roles in the coronation. As a second-born, he clearly does not want his children to be “disrespected” in the same way as he is.
Meanwhile, other sources report that Harry and Meghan wanted to celebrate their son’s birthday and Prince Harry’s decision to honor his father at his coronation was a compromise with the royal family. But already in Westminster Abbey, Prince Harry will be sitting with other non-working royals like Princesses Beatrice (34) and Eugenie (33) and their husbands, whom he also did not attack in his memoirs. He will probably not take part in the King’s procession in the church or to and from Buckingham Palace, nor will he stand on the balcony at the King’s side. Sources used: express.co.uk, dailymail.co.uk
